Ever wonder how mechanics and tire shops balanced tires before computers and subsequently electronic spin balancers existed?
They used gravity and physics, in the form of a bubble.
A balance can be no more certain than that for which gravity is visually showing you. In that regard, bubble balancers provide better accuracy then most spin balancers which work to .25oz increments.
Bubble balancers came in a few different designs:
But they worked on the same principle.
The top coned component rests on a pivot point, with a bubble indicator at the top.
The bubble is balanced to center before starting:
After the tire is placed on the balancer, the bubble will move relative to the light/heavy spot of the tire.
Once weights are placed on the light side, the bubble should come back to dead center; indicating a perfect static balance.
If using stick weights, weights should be placed dead center of the rim, or if using clip style weights the weights should be placed equally distributed between the front and back of the rim.
More visual learners can reference this video:
One thing a bubble balancer can not do is a dynamic balance, only static.
Those familiar with modern spin balancers know that even the modern machines still provide the choice of static balance or dynamic. So whats the deal with dynamic? and why provide the option?
In simplified terms, static imbalance, is imbalance up and own, while dynamic balance is imbalance side to side:
For a more in depth yet still understandable explanation:
So you’re thinking great, why wouldn’t everyone want a dynamic balance? Well, its not that simple. If you do a quick google search, it may seem that it really is that simple, but read-on, it really isn’t that black and white.
A static imbalance occurs at all times (including at full stop). Dynamic imbalance only occurs when the rotor is in motion. In the case of a solid rotor, dynamic balance can be more precisely calculated; however what happens if the rotor is flexible?
When the rotor (car wheel/tire in our case) is flexing as it spins, its also changing the distribution of weight in the dynamic plane.
When a tire is being balanced dynamically on an electronic wheel balancer, it is free floating in the machine with no external forces, or at best has a small roller on it called “road force”.
However lets examine multiple cases in which a tire differs in the real world from free spinning:
Centrifugal forces: As the tire spins faster, the centrifugal forces on the tire force it to balloon outward.
This is hyper noticeable in RC cars:
But also applicable to cars, reference the same effect to a lesser extent on this cars tire:
Heat: As tires heat up, they get softer, as well as build pressure. In extreme cases this change can be over 10psi.
Weight of the vehicle on the tire as well as the affect of camber: Cars vary in weight, as they do in the amount of factory camber. The left to right distribution of a tire changes relative to both of these factors.
In contrast, static balance does not get affected much by many of these factors because:
1. Centrifugal forces cause the the tire to become more round with increased speed (good thing).
2. Increased pressure from heat has a similar effect to point 1
3. Camber and weight of the vehicle wear relatively evenly in the static plane.
Therefore, what some many notice track side, is that most race teams, with massive budgets, as well as speed land record racers almost all only statically balance tires.
If you start digging enough you will notice that race tire manufacturers recommend only static balancing:
So now you hopefully understand, that dynamic balancing, although great in theory, tends to cause its own imbalances given real world circumstances.
Do you trust the laws of physics and gravity more then a computer and a person? Why trust a computer that needs calibration and a dummy tech, when you can perfectly static balance a tire at home with a device that costs under $150?